Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.86 seconds)

Union Of India vs Popular Construction Co on 5 October, 2001

54 Thus an arbitral award can in no circumstances be challenged after the expiry of three months, extendable with the further period of thirty days if applicant was prevented by sufficient cause for making the application within these three months. 55 In light of the law laid down in "Union of India Vs Popular Construction Company" (supra) and provisions of Section 34 (3), the present petition is badly time barred and is therefore non­maintainable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 678 - R Pal - Full Document

Madan & Co vs Wazir Jaivir Chand on 28 November, 1988

"Reliance is placed on M/s Madan and Co. Vs. Wazir jaivir Chand, AIR 1989 SCC 630, Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed in this case that if a registered letter addressed to a person at his residential address does not get served in the normal course and is returned, it can only be attributed to the addressee's own conduct. If he is staying away for some time all that he has to do is to leave necessary instructions with the postal authorities either to detain the letters addressed to him for some time until he returns or to forward to them to the address where he has gone or to delivered them to some other person authorized by him.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 409 - S Mukharji - Full Document
1   2 3 Next