Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (2.68 seconds)New India Ass. Co. Ltd vs Asha Rani & Ors on 3 December, 2002
"In our view, although the observations made in
Asha Rani case (supra) were in connection with carrying
passengers in a goods vehicle, the same would apply with
equal force to gratuitous passengers in any other vehicle
also. Thus, we must uphold the contention of the appel-
lant Insurance Company that it owed no liability towards
the injuries suffered by the deceased Rajinder Singh who
was a pillion rider, as the insurance policy was a statutory
policy, and hence it did not cover the risk of death of or
bodily injury to a gratuitous passenger."
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Shimla vs Tilak Singh And Ors on 4 April, 2006
In United India Assurance Co. Ltd., Shimla v. Tilak Singh and
Ors. (2006 (4) SCC 404), it has been noted as follows:
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
1