Rina Dutta & Ors vs Anjali Mahato & Ors on 18 May, 2010
By referring to the three Judges Bench
decision of this Court reported in 2010 (3)
Calcutta Law Times 232 (HC) (Rita Dutta & Ors.
vs. Anjali Mahato & Ors), it has further been
submitted that since no penal provision was
prescribed in the notification itself by the
respondent authority in case of any willful
suppression of any of the eligibility criteria as
mentioned therein, the respondent authority at
a later stage could not have invoked the
allegation of misconduct and imposed
punishment on the present petitioner. Learned
Advocate on behalf of the petitioner has prayed
for setting aside of the impugned order of the
respondent no.3 dated August 26, 2019.