Sanjay Kumar Ghai S/O Late Shri D.N. Ghai vs The State Through Its Chief Secretary, ... on 19 December, 2007
6.0 I consider that on 7/5/2011, Ld. Trial Court rightly restrained
itself from issuing any coercive process against the petitioner and merely
Page 4 of 6
CR No.2411 (Sanjay Ghai Vs. State)
directed the accused / petitioner to appear in person on 28/5/2010 for the
cross examination of the complainant witness. In such like cases, the
appearance can be exempted, if it is not resulting in the delay of the trial.
Sh. DM Bhalla, Ld. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that accused is
a diabetic patient and resides in Dehradun. It may be very difficult for him
to come and appear before the Ld. Trial Court on each and every date,
therefore, he may be exempted through Sh. Vijay Aggarwal, Adv as well as
Sh. Naveen Kapila, Adv. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
the petitioner undertakes that no delay shall take place on account of non
appearance of the petitioner as one of the two advocates i.e. Sh. Vijay
Aggarwal, Adv and Sh. Naveen Kapila, Adv will appear before the Ld.
Trial Court on the date fixed. In view of the submissions made, let the
petitioner appear in person before the Ld. Trial Court on 28/5/2011
and on that day the petitioner may move an application for permanent
exemption through his counsel Sh. Vijay Aggarwal, Adv and Sh.
Naveen Kapila, Adv and Ld. Trial Court may taking into account, the
conduct of the petitioner, consider the same as per law. With these
observations, the revision petition stands disposed off.