Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.83 seconds)Mohoram Sheikh Chaprasai And Anr. vs Telamuddin Khan And Anr. on 17 July, 1911
606; 16 C. W. N. 567; 15 C. L. J. 220. was distinguishable, inasmuch as in the case before him it had not been shown that the tenancy had been treated by the landlord as heritable and also because it had been found in the case in Moharam Sheikh Chaprasi v. Telamuddin Khan 13 Ind. Cas. 606; C. W. N. 567; 15 C. L. J. 220. that the land had been let out for residential purposes. Except as above he affirmed the decision of the trial Court. He held that the case had been rightly decided on the basis of the Cess Return in which the holding was shown as an agricultural one. He is quite right in saying that if the holding was non-agricultural, it should have been entered in part 3 of the Cess Return, which refers to tenure-holders according to the definition of that term under the Cess Act.
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
The Census Act, 1948
1