Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)
Suraj Pal vs Don Bosco School on 14 March, 2017 cites

Smt. Aina Devi vs Bachan Singh And Anr. on 7 January, 1980

15. The judgment of Aina Devi (supra) is not applicable to present case being distinguishable on facts. In the said case, the entry in the extract from the parivar register were also corroborated by extracts from electoral roll and the witness of petitioner which is not so in the present case. So, the same is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

State Of U.P. And Anr vs Shiv Narain Upadhyaya on 28 July, 2005

and not indolent. It is also held in number of cases that public servants should not be allowed to raise a dispute about their service records at the fag end of their service and such cases can be entertained only if the public servant approaches the Court within the reasonable time of proceedings the clinching material which can be held to be in exclusive nature. Reliance is placed on State of U.P. & Anr. v. Shiv Narayan Upadhyay, 2005 SCC (L&S) 794; State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. Pitamber Dutt Semwal, 2006 SCC (L&S) 106; and Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh v. Megh Raj Garg & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 2295. The abovesaid law applies with equal force to employees employed in private entities.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 125 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Punjab &Haryana High Court At ... vs Megh Raj Garg & Anr on 20 May, 2010

and not indolent. It is also held in number of cases that public servants should not be allowed to raise a dispute about their service records at the fag end of their service and such cases can be entertained only if the public servant approaches the Court within the reasonable time of proceedings the clinching material which can be held to be in exclusive nature. Reliance is placed on State of U.P. & Anr. v. Shiv Narayan Upadhyay, 2005 SCC (L&S) 794; State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. Pitamber Dutt Semwal, 2006 SCC (L&S) 106; and Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh v. Megh Raj Garg & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 2295. The abovesaid law applies with equal force to employees employed in private entities.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 38 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1