Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Asit Kumar Ghose vs Commissioner Of Agricultural ... on 8 May, 1952
4. Mr. Sovendu Roy appearing with Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Manna,
appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that when in the trial the
appellant was found not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 376 of the
Indian Penal Code, his conviction under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code
cannot be sustained in law. He further submitted that the accused was
acquitted of the charge under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code as the court
found that the defacto-complainant, who is an adult lady, was a consenting
party. According to Mr. Roy as she was a consenting party, therefore no case
under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code can be said to have been made out
as against him. Mr. Roy in support of his submissions relied upon several
decisions viz. on the decision of Sukumar Ghose Vs. State of West Bengal,
reported in 1985 (2)...., Raj Kumar Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal &
Anr., reported in 1992 Calcutta Criminal Law Reporter (Cal) 267, Hari Majhi
Vs. State, reported in 1990 Cri.
Abhoy Pradhan vs State Of West Bengal on 25 March, 1999
L. J. 650, Abhoy Pradhan Vs. The State of
West Bengal, reported in 1999 C Cr LR (Cal) 224, Uday Vs. State of
Karnataka, reported in (2003) 1 C Cr LR (SC) 555.
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Prabir Kumar Mondal vs State Of West Bengal And Anr. on 19 July, 2007
4. Mr. Sovendu Roy appearing with Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Manna,
appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that when in the trial the
appellant was found not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 376 of the
Indian Penal Code, his conviction under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code
cannot be sustained in law. He further submitted that the accused was
acquitted of the charge under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code as the court
found that the defacto-complainant, who is an adult lady, was a consenting
party. According to Mr. Roy as she was a consenting party, therefore no case
under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code can be said to have been made out
as against him. Mr. Roy in support of his submissions relied upon several
decisions viz. on the decision of Sukumar Ghose Vs. State of West Bengal,
reported in 1985 (2)...., Raj Kumar Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal &
Anr., reported in 1992 Calcutta Criminal Law Reporter (Cal) 267, Hari Majhi
Vs. State, reported in 1990 Cri.
1