Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.93 seconds)
Mrs. Anil Dogra vs Secretary(Labour)&Anr. on 3 August, 2012 cites

Matru Alias Girish Chandra vs State Of Utttar Pradesh on 3 March, 1971

11. After having considered the submissions made on behalf of both the parties and going through the record of this petition, I find myself in full agreement with both the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner by his learned counsel. It is admitted case of both the parties that the petitioner had been punished earlier by the respondent no.2- management by suspending her for four days for the same charges for which she was subsequently dismissed from service. I am of the view that the management could not have punished her twice for the same set of acts of misconduct and more particularly after the petitioner had already remained suspended for four days. For this view, I take support from the judgments of various High Courts reported as "Girish Chandra Singh v. State of U.P."; 2008 (1) AWC 906, "Leela Singh v. Punjab Electricity Board, Patiala"; 2006 Lab.I.C. 1491, "Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. v. N. Ramulu and others"; 1997(75) FLR49 and "Ganga Deen v. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Others";
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 281 - I D Dua - Full Document

Mrs. Leela Ohri And Ors. vs The Punjab State Electricity Board And ... on 22 April, 1993

11. After having considered the submissions made on behalf of both the parties and going through the record of this petition, I find myself in full agreement with both the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner by his learned counsel. It is admitted case of both the parties that the petitioner had been punished earlier by the respondent no.2- management by suspending her for four days for the same charges for which she was subsequently dismissed from service. I am of the view that the management could not have punished her twice for the same set of acts of misconduct and more particularly after the petitioner had already remained suspended for four days. For this view, I take support from the judgments of various High Courts reported as "Girish Chandra Singh v. State of U.P."; 2008 (1) AWC 906, "Leela Singh v. Punjab Electricity Board, Patiala"; 2006 Lab.I.C. 1491, "Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. v. N. Ramulu and others"; 1997(75) FLR49 and "Ganga Deen v. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Others";
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State ... vs N. Ramulu And Ors. on 6 November, 1995

11. After having considered the submissions made on behalf of both the parties and going through the record of this petition, I find myself in full agreement with both the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner by his learned counsel. It is admitted case of both the parties that the petitioner had been punished earlier by the respondent no.2- management by suspending her for four days for the same charges for which she was subsequently dismissed from service. I am of the view that the management could not have punished her twice for the same set of acts of misconduct and more particularly after the petitioner had already remained suspended for four days. For this view, I take support from the judgments of various High Courts reported as "Girish Chandra Singh v. State of U.P."; 2008 (1) AWC 906, "Leela Singh v. Punjab Electricity Board, Patiala"; 2006 Lab.I.C. 1491, "Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. v. N. Ramulu and others"; 1997(75) FLR49 and "Ganga Deen v. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Others";
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 1 - Cited by 26 - B S Reddy - Full Document
1