Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)Section 4 in The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 427 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sushil Kumar vs The State Of Haryana on 19 January, 2022
In Kamroonissa Vs. The State of Maharashtra,
1975 (3) SCC 272, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that for the
purpose of satisfying itself as to whether it would be desirable to proceed
under Section 3 or Section 4 of the Act, the Court shall call for a report from
the Probation Officer and consider it. In the case of Sushil Kumar Vs. State of
Haryana and others, 2018(4) RCR (Criminal) 868, this Court by referring to
the case of M.C.D. Vs. State of Delhi (Supra) has held that it is mandatory for
the Court to call for the report of the Probation Officer as per Section 4 and to
consider the same though the Court is not bound by the said report.