Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Bhagat Singh Bugga vs Dewan Jagbir Sawhney on 28 January, 1941
In Bhagat Singh v. Jagbir Sawhney, AIR 1941 Cal 670, it is held that
residence means "where a person eats, drinks and
sleeps or where his family or his servants eat, drink
and sleep" (see also Kumudnath v. Jatendranath,
ILR 38 Cal 394).
Juharimal Senaji vs Liladhar Madhavji Satwara on 22 July, 1948
(Mohan Singh v. Lajya Ram, AIR 1956 Punj 188, Juharimal v. Liladhar, AIR 1949 Bom 304 and Shit Monshi Verjang v. Sha Jivraj Mandan, AIR 1052 Kutch 58, may also be referred to).
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Intu Miah Mistry vs Darbuksh Bhuiyan on 15 May, 1914
In Intumiah Mistry v. Durbuksh Bhuiyan, ILR 42 Cal 67 : (AIR 1914 Cal 845), since it was found that a notice was served under provisions of Rule 15 and Rule 16 of Order 5 C. P. C. and the defendant had an opportunity of hearing as he was in communication with the members of his family both before and after the service, it was held, that the service was sufficient and the ex parte decree could not be set aside.
Mohan Singh vs Lajya Ram And Ors. on 27 April, 1956
(Mohan Singh v. Lajya Ram, AIR 1956 Punj 188, Juharimal v. Liladhar, AIR 1949 Bom 304 and Shit Monshi Verjang v. Sha Jivraj Mandan, AIR 1052 Kutch 58, may also be referred to).
1