Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)

Northern Railway vs M/S Pioneer Publicity Corporation Pvt ... on 1 September, 2015

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that it is appropriate to condone the delay in these applications. The judgment of the Supreme Court in Northern Railway vs. Pioneer Publicity Corporation Pvt. Ltd.3 clearly states that the maximum condonable period 1 OMP (COMM) 465/2022, OMP (COMM) 466/2022, OMP (COMM) 467/2022 and OMP (COMM) 469/2022.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 24 - S Sachdeva - Full Document

Of Operation Of Arbitral Awards) ... vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited on 15 May, 2023

4. As there was no counter-claim in any of the cases, the question of pecuniary jurisdiction has to be determined on the basis of the value of the claims. We must, therefore, turn to the enumeration of the claim amounts in the above tables, and are not concerned with the awarded amounts. Although some of the interest claims were not quantified at the stage of filing of the statements of claim, it is clear from the quantum of the principal claims and the rate of interest claimed that, even upon addition of interest until the date of invocation of the arbitration, the claims would not cross the Rs. 2 crore mark in any of these cases. The principle that, for this purpose, interest would have to be computed until the date of invocation of the arbitration is laid down in a recent judgment of a Coordinate Bench in Simentech India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.4
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1