Smt. Baljinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Another on 12 December, 2008
2. Facts are being extracted from Civil Writ Petition
No.1169 of 2011 titled "Balwinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab &
others".
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)Harjinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 5 September, 2000
9. That being so and following the view taken in Harjinder Kaur's case (supra), I allow these writ petitions; quash the impugned orders; and direct the respondents to formally regularise services of the deceased employees and thereafter grant Family Pension from the date(s) of their death. Arrears of Family Pension shall be paid to the petitioner(s) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order failing which the petitioner(s) shall be entitled to interest @ 7% per annum. Any other benefit to which the family members are entitled to in accordance with Government Policies, shall also be granted within the stipulated period.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & ... vs Surji Devi on 22 January, 2008
8. In my considered view, the cited decision has no
bearing on the facts of the case in hand. The deceased employee in
CWP No.1169 of 2011 [6]
that case was a member of the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme
and served in a non-pensionable establishment. On the other hand,
the post of Pump Operator under the respondent-Department is a
pensionable post. It has been held by this Court in a series of cases
that work charge/ daily wage service rendered prior to regular
appointment is countable towards 'qualifying service' for the
purpose of pension and other retiral benefits.
1