Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.40 seconds)Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors on 16 March, 2005
provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act are not applicable to the
present set of facts. However, as per provisions of Section 31(5) of the
Act, the Arbitrator is bound to deliver a signed copy of the arbitral award to
each party. The Court below while placing reliance upon judgment of
Hon'ble Supreme Court in case Union of India Vs. Tecco Tricy
Engineers & Contractors, 2005(2) RCR (Civil) 420 observed that as in
this case Arbitrator failed to deliver the signed copy, the period of limitation
did not start to run as per contention of learned counsel for the present
petitioner.
The Limitation Act, 1963
Tez Kaur vs Union Of India And Others on 16 September, 2013
placed upon judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case Rajinder
Kaur Vs. Union of India, Department of Road Transport and Highways
and others, 2014(2) PLR 128 and in case Tez Kaur Vs. Union of India
and others CR-4828 of 2012 decided on 16.09.2013.
Section 32 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Rajinder Kaur And Others vs Pepsu Road Transport Corporation And ... on 1 October, 2008
placed upon judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case Rajinder
Kaur Vs. Union of India, Department of Road Transport and Highways
and others, 2014(2) PLR 128 and in case Tez Kaur Vs. Union of India
and others CR-4828 of 2012 decided on 16.09.2013.
1