Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.23 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Anil Singh on 26 August, 1988
Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that initially the F.I.R was lodged under Section 302 I.P.C and during investigation same was converted into Section 306 I.P.C. There is no evidence of abetment to commit suicide by the deceased. There is no external injury on any part of the body of deceased except a ligature mark. Deceased was the real daughter of applicant no. 1 and step daughter of applicant-2. She was a regular student and was getting education. While she was going to attend the coaching and was talking with her friend on mobile, the mobile was snatched away by other persons of the family. Moreover, the informant has filed the F.I.R against applicant no. 1 and his family which was registered as case crime no. 243 of 2004 under Section 498A,323 I.P.C, P.S Kuberasthan, District Kushinagar, in that case crime a compromise took place between the parties on 15.04.2000. The compromise was filed in the court concerned and the same was verified by the court concerned, compromise was Annexure-6 to the affidavit. On the basis of compromise in that case applicant and other accused were acquitted. .
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 174A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Satendra Kumar Antil vs C.B.I. And Another on 1 July, 2021
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
Anil Singh vs State Of U.P. on 21 November, 2022
Subsequent to above order one of the co-accused namely Anil Singh (husband of applicant) has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 21596 of 2022 (Anil Singh Vs. State of U.P.). For ready reference, the same is extracted hereinunder:-