Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 54 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Orissa vs Kanduri Sahoo on 4 December, 2003
In State of
Orissa Vs. Kanduri Sahoo 2004(1) RCR (Criminal) 196
(S.C.), it was held that mere delay in sending the samples to
the Laboratory, is not fatal, where there is evidence that the
seized articles remained in safe custody. Since, it was proved
that none tampered with the samples, until the same were
received, in the office of the Chemical Examiner, the
Crl. Appeal No. 846-SB of 2001
17
submission of the Counsel for the appellant, merely based on
conjectures, does not hold good. The principle of law, laid
down, in the aforesaid authority, is fully applicable to the
facts of the instant case. The submission of the Counsel for
the appellant, being without merit, must fail, and the same
stands rejected.
Section 43 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 55 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Baldev Singh on 21 July, 1999
In State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh,
1999(6) S.C.C. 172, a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court,
settled beyond doubt, that the language of Section 50, was
implicitly clear that the search had to be, in relation to a
person, and not in relation to the premises, vehicles, or
articles. Similar view was taken in Smt. Krishna Kanwar
Crl.