Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.35 seconds)

Cce, Jaipur-Ii vs M/S.Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills ... on 28 July, 2011

15. We find that the controversy can be laid to rest by making a reference to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of CCE, Jaipur vs Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., 2010 (255) ELT 481 (SC), wherein the Honble Supreme Court has considered an identical issue of steel plates and MS channels used in the fabrication of chimney for diesel generating set. The credit stands allowed in the light of Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 159 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Central ... vs Jawahar Mills Ltd. & Ors on 27 July, 2001

In the said judgment, the Apex Court has referred to the user test evolved by the Apex Court in the case of CCE, Coimbatore vs Jawahar Mills Ltd., 2001 (132) ELT 3 (SC), which is required to be satisfied to find out whether or not particular goods could be said to be capital goods. When we apply the user test to the case in hand, we find that the structural steel items have been used for the fabrication of support structures for capital goods. The appellants have argued that the various capital goods, such as, kiln, material handling conveyor system, furnace etc. cannot be suspended in mid air. They will need to be suitably supported to facilitate smooth functioning of such machines. It is obvious that the structural items have been suitably worked upon for this purpose. Accordingly, the goods fabricated, using such structurals, will have to be considered as parts of the relevant machines. The definition of Capital Goods includes, components, spares and accessories of such capital goods. Accordingly, applying the User Test to the facts in hand, we have no hesitation in holding that the structural items used in the fabrication of support structures would fall within the ambit of Capital Goods as contemplated under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, hence will be entitled to the Cenvat Credit.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 230 - S P Bharucha - Full Document
1