Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 225 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Debi Prasad Sharma vs Emperor on 25 June, 1943
It may be added at this place that the Supreme Court made a reference to a number of earlier decisions, including the decision in the case of Debi Prasad Sharma v The King Emperor, AIR 1943 PC 202 in order to reach the conclusion that scandalous talks on Judges while acting in administrative capacity also can form basis of contempt proceedings.
Brahma Prakash Sharma And Others vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 8 May, 1953
The Supreme Court thereafter held that the contempt committed by the appellant in that case was of a technical nature and did not call for any punishment.
Sammbhu Nath Jha vs Kedar Prasad Sinha & Ors on 24 January, 1972
In the case of Sammbhu Nath Jha v. Kedar Pra-sad Sinha, (1972) 1 SCC 573 = (AIR 1972 SC 1515). The Supreme Court repeated the same principle as follows:--
Rex vs B.S. Nayyar on 31 January, 1950
(9) That the impugned resolutions were passed in the background stated in the counter-affidavit of contemner No. 1, that they related to non-judicial acts of the Hon'ble Chief Justice and, in view of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Rex v. B.. S. Nayyar, AIR 1950 Ail 549, the resolutions in question are not punishable as they do not amount to contempt of this Court.