Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.44 seconds)Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co vs Ludh Budh Singh on 11 January, 1972
(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (I.D. Act in short). The
challenge raised by the appellant to set aside the domestic enquiry
was upheld by the Labour Court, for the reason that the worker was
not permitted to be represented by a Lawyer, however granting an
opportunity to the management to substantiate the position by
adducing fresh evidence. This was stated as without any regard to
the law declared by the Apex Court in Delhi Cloth and General
Mills Co. Vs. Ludh Budh Singh [1972 (1) SCC 595] and hence
challenged by the Management in the Writ Petition. The learned
single Judge though upheld the Preliminary Award passed by the
W.A. No. 1320 of 2016
: 2 :
Labour Court, went further and permitted the writ
petitioner/management to proceed with the domestic enquiry after
permitting to be represented through a Lawyer. This is challenged in
this appeal filed by the worker.
1