Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.60 seconds)Section 16 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt.Ltd vs Food Inspector & Anr on 18 November, 2010
Even otherwise, in view of the decision in
Pepsico India Holdings (supra), the conviction in this case
cannot be sustained as no laboratory was notified and no
validated method of analysis was specified as mandated
under Section 23 (1-A) (ee) and (hh) of the Prevention of
Food Adulteration Act, 1954.
Gopalakrishnan vs The Excise Inspector on 22 July, 2021
In the decision of
this Court in Gopalakrishnan v. Food Inspector [2013 (3)
KLT 455], the court relied on the decision of the Supreme
Court in Pepsico India Holdings (supra) and found that
the Public Analyst's report was not admissible in evidence
and accordingly, the Court acquitted the accused. The
Crl.R.P.3158/2006
: 5 :
matter was referred to a Division Bench and the Division
Bench also affirmed the said decision, submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public
Prosecutor.
1