Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.34 seconds)
Chinta Mani vs Dharam Dutt And Anr on 30 November, 2016 cites

D. Stephens vs Nosibolla on 2 March, 1951

"40. This question has been considered in the celebrated judgment of Akalu Ahir & Ors. v. Ramdeo Ram [(1973) 2 SCC 583], where, after considering the judgments of D. Stephens v. Nosibolla [1951 SCR 284], Logendranath Jha v. Polailal [1951 SCR 676], K.C. Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh [(1963) 3 SCR 412] and Mahendra Pratap Singh v. Sarju Singh [(1968) 2 SCR 287] this Court came out with categories of case which would justify the High Court in interfering with the finding of acquittal in revision: (Akalu Ahir case, SCC pp. 587-88, para8) "(i) Where the trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the case, but has still acquitted the appellant-
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 398 - N C Aiyar - Full Document

Mahendra Pratap Singh vs Sarju Singh & Anr on 20 November, 1967

"40. This question has been considered in the celebrated judgment of Akalu Ahir & Ors. v. Ramdeo Ram [(1973) 2 SCC 583], where, after considering the judgments of D. Stephens v. Nosibolla [1951 SCR 284], Logendranath Jha v. Polailal [1951 SCR 676], K.C. Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh [(1963) 3 SCR 412] and Mahendra Pratap Singh v. Sarju Singh [(1968) 2 SCR 287] this Court came out with categories of case which would justify the High Court in interfering with the finding of acquittal in revision: (Akalu Ahir case, SCC pp. 587-88, para8) "(i) Where the trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the case, but has still acquitted the appellant-
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 373 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document

Kalu Ahir And Others vs Ramdeo Ram on 1 May, 1973

"40. This question has been considered in the celebrated judgment of Akalu Ahir & Ors. v. Ramdeo Ram [(1973) 2 SCC 583], where, after considering the judgments of D. Stephens v. Nosibolla [1951 SCR 284], Logendranath Jha v. Polailal [1951 SCR 676], K.C. Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh [(1963) 3 SCR 412] and Mahendra Pratap Singh v. Sarju Singh [(1968) 2 SCR 287] this Court came out with categories of case which would justify the High Court in interfering with the finding of acquittal in revision: (Akalu Ahir case, SCC pp. 587-88, para8) "(i) Where the trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the case, but has still acquitted the appellant-
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 267 - K K Mathew - Full Document
1   2 3 Next