Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.25 seconds)

Rai Sandeep @ Deepu vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 7 August, 2012

40. Applying the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rai Sandeep (supra) and Ramdas (Supra), this court is of the considered opinion that PW-2/injured Sh. Karan Sharma & PW-3/complainant Ms. Khushi Nagpal are not witnesses of sterling quality as their versions are not natural and they have also failed to withstood the test of cross examination. This court is of the considered opinion that the testimonies of PW-2/injured Sh. Karan Sharma & PW-3/complainant Ms. Khushi Nagpal are not clear, cogent, credible, trustworthy and consistent and same have not been corroborated by the other prosecution witnesses and other corroborative evidence on record and the circumstances.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 465 - Full Document

Ramdas And Others vs State Of Maharashtra on 7 November, 2006

40. Applying the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rai Sandeep (supra) and Ramdas (Supra), this court is of the considered opinion that PW-2/injured Sh. Karan Sharma & PW-3/complainant Ms. Khushi Nagpal are not witnesses of sterling quality as their versions are not natural and they have also failed to withstood the test of cross examination. This court is of the considered opinion that the testimonies of PW-2/injured Sh. Karan Sharma & PW-3/complainant Ms. Khushi Nagpal are not clear, cogent, credible, trustworthy and consistent and same have not been corroborated by the other prosecution witnesses and other corroborative evidence on record and the circumstances.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 350 - B P Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next