Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)Section 74 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 75 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Mammu vs Hari Mohan & Anr on 7 January, 2000
The High Court has rightly reversed the decision of the Appellate Authority
after careful examination of the divergent findings of fact recorded by it
as the same are contrary to both the documentary and oral evidence on
record, particularly Ext.B1. Thus, in the light of all the material
evidence on record and the statutory provisions under Sections 74 and 75 of
the Act, the relevant and glaring error on fact and in law committed by the
Appellate Authority has been rightly interfered with by the High Court,
after it had satisfied itself that the divergent findings of the Appellate
Authority are not only erroneous but also error in law and it has exercised
its revisional jurisdiction and set aside the divergent findings of the
Appellate Authority. Reliance has been placed upon the decision of this
Court in Mammu v. Hari Mohan[1], which reads thus:-
Section 84 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
1