Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.70 seconds)Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946
Article 234 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The State Of Maharashtra vs Labour Law Practitioners' Association ... on 11 February, 1998
This Court, in the case of State of Maharashtra vs. Labour Law
Practitioners' Association & Ors., (1998) 2 SCC 688, held that the
Labour Court Judges and the Judges of the Industrial Court belong to
Judicial service and recruitment is to be made in accordance with Article
234 of the Constitution of India. The existing Recruitment Rules did not
comply with the provision of Article 234 of the Constitution of India. The
State Government, therefore, referred to the High Court for consultation
and approval of the Rules. The administrative side of the High Court
framed the Draft Rules and the appointment offered to Shri N.A. Acharya
was in accordance with the Draft Rules. This apart, the eligibility criteria for
appointment on the post of the President of the Industrial Court has been
determined by the High court and the same has been incorporated in the
Draft Recruitment Rules at the request of the Government.
Section 9 in Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 [Entire Act]
1