Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.87 seconds)Thammanna vs K. Veera Reddy & Ors on 23 July, 1980
In Thammanna vs. K.Veera Reddy and Others, (1980) 4 SCC
62, it has been held that although the meaning of the expression "person
aggrieved" may vary according to the context of the statute and the facts of
the case, nevertheless, normally, " a ' person aggrieved ' must be a man
who has suffered a legal grievance, a man against whom a decision has
been pronounced which has wrongfully deprived him of something or
wrongfully refused him something, or wrongfully affected his title to something."
Sri Gopabandhu Biswal vs Krishna Chandra Mohanty & Ors on 21 April, 1998
10. However, learned counsel for the Applicant has invited our
attention to the decision rendered by the Apex Court In Gopabandhu
Biswal vs. Krishna Chandra Mohanty and others , (1998) 4 SCC 447.
The question that came up for consideration in this case was whether a
Review Application by a third party could be entertained by the
Administrative Tribunal, if he was " aggrieved " by the decision rendered by
the Tribunal. While answering the above question in the affirmative the
Court held that " only persons who are directly and immediately affected by
the impugned order can be considered as parties aggrieved."
M/S Northern Plastics Ltd vs Hindustan Photo Films Mfg.Co. Ltd on 20 February, 1997
In Northern Plastics Limited vs. Hindustan Photo Films
Manufacturing Company Limited, (1997) 4 SCC 452, the Lordships of the
Supreme Court had made the following observations:
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 14 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1