Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.30 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005
In Brij Nandan Jaiswal v. Munna, (2009) 1 SCC 678, which
concerned a challenge to grant of bail in a serious offence, this
Court has reiterated the same position as was observed in
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar (supra). This Court has held as under:
Abdul Basit @ Raju & Ors. Etc. vs Md.Abdul Kadir Choudhary on 15 September, 2014
In Abdul Basit alias Raju And Others v. Mohd. Abdul Kadir Chaudhary
And Another22, this Court has opined that :
Daulat Ram And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 December, 2018
24. As can be discerned from the above decisions, for cancelling bail once
granted, the Court must consider whether any supervening circumstances
have arisen or the conduct of the accused post grant of bail demonstrates that
it is no longer conducive to a fair trial to permit him to retain his freedom by
enjoying the concession of bail during trial 24. To put it differently, in ordinary
24 Refer 1995 (1) SCC 349 (Daulat Ram and Others vs. State of Haryana)
Page 14 of 20
CRL. A. NO. OF 2022 @ SLP (CRL.) NO.3564 OF 2022
circumstances, this Court would be loath to interfere with an order passed by
the Court below granting bail but if such an order is found to be illegal or
perverse or premised on material that is irrelevant, then such an order is
susceptible to scrutiny and interference by the Appellate Court. Some of the
circumstances where bail granted to the accused under Section 439 (1) of the
Cr.P.C. can be cancelled are enumerated below: -
Masroor vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 27 April, 2009
In Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh
And Another17, it has been observed by this Court as follows:
Dolat Ram & Ors vs The State Of Haryana on 11 November, 1994
In Dolat Ram And
Others v. State of Haryana19, this Court has held that very cogent and
overwhelming circumstances are necessary for cancellation of bail and bail
once granted, should not be cancelled in a mechanical manner. It is equally
true that an unjustified or perverse order of bail is vulnerable to interference
18 (2012) 9 SCC 446
19 (1995) 1 SCC 349
Page 11 of 20
CRL. A. NO. OF 2022 @ SLP (CRL.) NO.3564 OF 2022
by the superior Court.