Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.30 seconds)Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 65 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 63 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 59 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 62 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Bipin Shantilal Panchal vs State Of Gujarat And Anr on 22 February, 2001
21. In so far as the facts of the present case are concerned, it appears that
the learned Trial Court had given tentative exhibit number to the CD and
thereafter give it Exh. no. 52., relying upon the decision of the Supreme
Court in case of Bipin Shantial Panchal( supra).
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal on 14 July, 2020
(2) A copy of the CD shall be provided to the accused.
(3) Admissibility of the CD in evidence would be
permissible after following the provisions of Sections 65A and
65B of the Indian Evidence Act which has been explained
thoroughly by the Supreme Court in case of Anvar P.V. and
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar(supra).
Shafhi Mohammad vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 3 April, 2018
73.2 The clarification referred to above is that the required
certificate under Section 65B(4) is unnecessary if the original
document itself is produced. This can be done by the owner
of a laptop computer, computer tablet or even a mobile
phone, by stepping into the witness box and proving that the
device concerned, on which the original information is first
stored, is owned and/or operated by him. In cases where the
"computer" happens to be a part of a "computer system" or
"computer network" and it becomes impossible to physically
bring such system or network to the Court, then the only
means of providing information contained in such electronic
record can be in accordance with Section 65B(1), together
with the requisite certificate under Section 65B(4).