Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products ... vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 19 February, 1969

5. We are of the opinion that this contention cannot be accepted. So far as the principle is concerned, there can be little quarrel about it. The test in such cases is, whether particular charges are incurred prior to the sale or subsequent to the sale ? In other words, the enquiry ought to be at what point has the sale taken place. Any expenses incurred by the assessee before the sale must be borne by him and any expenses incurred after the point of sale must be borne by the customer. Of course again there may be cases, as in the case of Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh , where there is a specific stipulation between the parties that the amount representing freight would not be payable as part of the consideration for the sale of goods, but by way of reimbursement of the freight, which was payable by the purchaser, but in fact disbursed by the dealer.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 80 - J C Shah - Full Document

Hindustan Sugar Mills Etc vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors on 22 August, 1978

8. It has been held further by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan that the test is what is the consideration passing from the purchaser to the dealer for the sale of the goods and that it is immaterial to inquire as to how the amount of consideration was arrived at and whether it includes excise duty or sales tax or freight. The only relevant question is as to what is the amount payable by the purchaser to the dealer as consideration for the sale and not as to what is the net consideration receivable by the dealer, the court observed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 207 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1