Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (1.03 seconds)Kerala University Act, 1974
The Amending Act, 1897
The States Reorganisation Act, 1956
Section 5 in The States Reorganisation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in Kerala University Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Purshottam Govindji Halai vs Shree B. M. Desai, Additional Collector ... on 14 October, 1955
The
821
differences between the two parts of the State have
reasonable nexus to the said object. Because of the said
differences the legislature thought that the definition of
"Previous year" should be so amended in respect of the
Madras area that the assessees in that area may not escape
payment of agricultural income-tax in respect of the period
after the said area formed part of the Kerala State. It is
argued that this Court sustained the constitutional validity
of a law on geographical and territorial bases only in a
case where the said law was a preexisting law in an
erstwhile State which continued to be law in the area of
that State after it merged in the larger unit, and that it
cannot be invoked where the law is for the first time
enacted after the merger, for, it is said, in that event the
law governs the new State as an indivisible unit. Reliance
is placed upon the decision of this Court in Shri Kishan
Singh v, The State of Rajasthan(1) and Purshottam Govindji
Halai v. Shree B.M. Desai, Additional Collector of Bombay
(2). But a perusal of the Judgments does not bear out the
contention. The validity of classification does not wholly
depend upon the source of law; the law may be a preexisting
law or one that was enacted after merger. What is important
is to ascertain the existing circumstances in the two parts
merged into one by historical events in order to determine
whether the differences between the two have a reasonable
nexus to the object of the said law. For the reasons
already stated, we hold that the classification in the
present case is founded on an intelligible differentia
between the assessees of the two parts of the State, and
that the said differences have rational relationship to the
object of the Amending Act.