Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)Section 3 in The Official Secrets Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Official Secrets Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Official Secrets Act, 1923
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Finance Act, 2018
M. Sivasankar vs Union Of India on 25 January, 2021
Reliance is
also placed on the decision reported as 2021 SCC Online Kerala 395 titled
M.Sivasankar Vs. Union of India. to contend that since the amount involved
is less than ₹1 Crore, the Proviso to Section 45 of the PMLA would be
applicable.
Upendra Rai vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 9 July, 2019
249/2019 titled as Upendra Rai Vs. Directorate of Enforcement. The twin
conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA not being applicable, the triple
test is required to be applied so as to consider grant of bail to the petitioner.
Though learned Additional Solicitor General has strenuously argued that
since the petitioner has connection with Chinese handlers and intelligence
agencies, he is a serious flight risk, however, the petitioner is an Indian
citizen, his wife is also an Indian citizen employed in JNU and thus, has
roots in society. There is no allegation against the petitioner that after being
released on default bail in FIR No. 230/2020 registered at Special Cell on 4 th
December 2020 till 1st July 2021, the petitioner either tampered with
evidence or influenced any witness. The petitioner joined the investigation
as and when directed prior to 1st July 2021 before arrest.