Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.95 seconds)Article 215 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971
The Special Courts Act, 1979
Pallav Sheth vs Custodian & Ors on 10 August, 2001
27. First of all, the facts of the above said case is that the suo motu issuance of notice for the offence of contempt was initiated within a period of limitation of one year. Secondly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred the decision in the case of Pallav Seth v. Custodian and Others [ (2001) 7 SCC 549 ]. wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has elaborately discussed all these circumstances. The ultimate interpretation would be that the limitation prescribed under Section 20 has to be read harmoniously along with Article 215 of the Constitution of India.
Section 15 in The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Article 129 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Chandra Prakash And Ors vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 4 April, 2002
22.In Chandra Prakash and Others V. State of U.P. And Another ((2002) 4 SCC 234), another Constitution Bench dealing with the concept of precedents stated thus:-
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Municipal Corporation & Anr on 7 April, 1995
The court noted the observations in Rabhubir Sinch (supra) and reproduced a passage from Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. V. Municipal Corporation (1995) 4 SCC 96) which is to the following effect: