Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)
Baroda Road Tankers And Anr. vs Deputy General Manager - Lpg North Zone ... on 6 January, 2015
cites
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
G.J. Fernandez vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 1 February, 1990
Secondly, arguendo, even in the absence of the above specification, the
imperative nature of Section 58 (1) and 58 (3) allow any exceptions, when a
notification (read the 1996 notification) stipulates specifications. The
contentions of the Baroda group regarding arbitrariness and discrimination,
therefore, are unpersuasive. There can be no two opinions that tender
conditions bind both the state agency which invites bids for goods and
services, as well as the potential supplier of those goods and services, i.e. the
tenderer/bidder. (Ref G.J. Fernandez vs State Of Karnataka & Ors AIR
1990 SC 958; State of NCT of Delhi and Another v. Sanjeev alias Bittoo
(2005) 5 SCC 181).
The Right to Information Act, 2005
State Of N.C.T. Of Delhi And Anr vs Sanjeev @ Bittoo on 4 April, 2005
Secondly, arguendo, even in the absence of the above specification, the
imperative nature of Section 58 (1) and 58 (3) allow any exceptions, when a
notification (read the 1996 notification) stipulates specifications. The
contentions of the Baroda group regarding arbitrariness and discrimination,
therefore, are unpersuasive. There can be no two opinions that tender
conditions bind both the state agency which invites bids for goods and
services, as well as the potential supplier of those goods and services, i.e. the
tenderer/bidder. (Ref G.J. Fernandez vs State Of Karnataka & Ors AIR
1990 SC 958; State of NCT of Delhi and Another v. Sanjeev alias Bittoo
(2005) 5 SCC 181).