Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.44 seconds)Section 2 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Supreme Court Bar Association & Ors vs B.D. Kaushik on 26 September, 2011
Thus, when examined in the light of the ratio of Supreme
Court Bar Association Vs. B.D. Kaushik (supra), then Court annexed Bar
Association being a different class, cannot be allowed to be diluted by the
Court merely for the convenience of certain members of the petitioner
Association, without there being any ideological basis for their separation as has
been discussed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Madras High
Court Advocates' Association (supra).
Section 7 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Vineet Narain & Others vs Union Of India & Another on 18 December, 1997
In Vineet Narain v. Union of India [(1998) 1 SCC 226 :
Prabhat College vs Barkatullah University on 31 July, 2012
56. Thus, it is evident that there being no illegality, irrationality or procedural
impropriety in the decision of the State Bar Council, it does not call for
interference. Submission of Shri Vipin Yadav, learned counsel placing reliance
on the decision of a Division Bench of this High Court in Swakshtagrahi
Sangh, Janpad Panchayat Niwas Vs. Union of India and others, Writ
Appeal No.91 of 2022, decided on 15.03.2022, to point out that the petition
in absence of resolution and authorisation, is not maintainable in the light of the
decision of the High Court in Prabhat Vs. Barkatulla University [2011 ILR
MP 1692], has strong foundation.
Binoy Viswam vs Union Of India And Ors. on 4 September, 2017
57. Thus, decision in Binvoy Viswam Vs. Union of India and others (AIR
2017 SC 2967), has a direct application to the facts of the case, inasmuch as,
neither any violation of the Advocates Act of 1961 nor that of the Act of 1982,
could be brought on record.