Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)

Dresser Rand S.A vs Bindal Agro Chem Ltd And K. G. Khosla ... on 12 January, 2006

11. Mr. Ashwani to K. Sharma, Advocate, representing the defendant/appellant would r learned Senior contend that in absence of any concluded contract between the parties to pay the rent, fixation of liability against the defendant/appellant was perverse and against the law. He would submit that the terms of LOI could not be considered to be binding on the defendant. The defendant was justified in not executing the lease deed in favour of the plaintiff for the reasons that the land did not comply with the requirements of defendant company. He placed reliance on the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dresser Rand S.A. vs. Bindal Agro Chem Ltd & another, 2006 (1) SCC 751 and South Eastern Coalfields Ltd vs. S. Kumar's Associates AKM (JV) to ::: Downloaded on - 08/09/2025 21:30:55 :::CIS -7- assert that the terms of LOI could not be construed as concluded contract between the parties.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 204 - Full Document

South Eastern Coalfields Limited vs Ashok Kumar Thakur 8 Wpl/223/2017 ... on 6 March, 2020

11. Mr. Ashwani to K. Sharma, Advocate, representing the defendant/appellant would r learned Senior contend that in absence of any concluded contract between the parties to pay the rent, fixation of liability against the defendant/appellant was perverse and against the law. He would submit that the terms of LOI could not be considered to be binding on the defendant. The defendant was justified in not executing the lease deed in favour of the plaintiff for the reasons that the land did not comply with the requirements of defendant company. He placed reliance on the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dresser Rand S.A. vs. Bindal Agro Chem Ltd & another, 2006 (1) SCC 751 and South Eastern Coalfields Ltd vs. S. Kumar's Associates AKM (JV) to ::: Downloaded on - 08/09/2025 21:30:55 :::CIS -7- assert that the terms of LOI could not be construed as concluded contract between the parties.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1