Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)The Central Excise Act, 1944
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
M/S. Shivom Ply-N-Wood Pvt. Ltd, Mrs. ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... on 22 March, 2001
13. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of O.K. Play (India) Ltd. v. CCE
, has been held that:
Section 11 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
National Agricultural Co-Operative ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 March, 2003
(viii) In the UP. Co-op Federation Ltd. v. UOI , the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, held that mechanically Tractors and Tillers are two different entities and are known as such in commercial parlance. Power Tiller is not a Tractor.
Section 2 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
Bandela Nagaraju And Ors. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 4 October, 1983
In the case of A. Nagaraju Brothers v. State of Andhra Pradesh , it has been held by this Court that no one single universal test can be applied for correct classification. There cannot be a static parameter for correct classification.
Cce vs Alcobex Metals Ltd. on 11 October, 2004
(xxii) In the case of CCE v. Alcobex Metals it has been held that "Once the notice is issued under the proviso for larger period, it cannot be treated as a notice under main Section 11A for shorter period of six months.
1