Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.69 seconds)Chanmuniya vs Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha & Anr on 7 October, 2010
32. Adverting to the dicta of Hon'ble Supreme court in Chanmuniya (supra) it can be held that a very broad and expansive interpretation is required to be given to term 'wife' for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. so as to include those cases where a man and woman have been living together as husband and wife a reasonable long period of time, and strict proof of marriage should not be a precondition for maintenance in such cases. Therefore, the impugned judgment and order is not sustainable.
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 494 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 146 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Antitrust - Section 26(2) Disclaimer: ... vs Shri Sushil Ansal And Shri Pranav Ansal, ... on 23 December, 2014
The applicants have no legal right to claim maintenance from him. The applicant No.1 had moved an application before the higher authorities for getting her name entered in service book of opposite party. The alleged marriage of opposite party and applicant No.1 is void ab initio, because in hindu law, remarriage in life time of spouse is not permissible. Opposite party has filed an application before the family court, Deoria which is registered as Case No.205 of 2022 Gaurav Vs. Madhu Yadav for getting decree of annulment of alleged marriage dated 15.06.2020 with applicant No.1.
Kamala vs M.R.Mohan Kumar on 24 October, 2018
In another judgment Kamala and others Vs. M.R. Mohan Kumar AIR 2018 SC 5218 Hon'ble Court observed as under:-
Mohabbat Ali Khan vs Muhammad Ibrahim Khan on 7 March, 1929
In Mohabbat Ali Khan v. Mohd. Ibrahim Khan AIR 1929 PC 135 the Privy Council has laid down that the law presumes in favour of marriage and against concubinage when a man and woman have cohabited continuously for number of years.
Badri Prasad vs Dy. Director Of Consolidation And Ors on 1 August, 1978
15. Further, in Badri Prasad v. Director of Consolidation (1978) 3 SCC 527, the Supreme Court held that a strong presumption arises in favour of wedlock where the partners have lived together for a long spell as husband and wife. Although the presumption is rebuttable, a heavy burden lies on him who seeks to deprive the relationship of legal origin.