Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.77 seconds)State Of Haryana And Anr vs Tilak Raj And Ors on 14 July, 2003
11. As regards the argument raised that there are no comparable
sanctioned posts for Advance Booking Agents and, thus, no
comparison can be made, this court places reliance upon a
judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana
vs Tilak Raj 2003 (6) SCC 123 wherein it was held :
State Of Punjab And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And Ors on 26 October, 2016
10. Not only that, the Hon'ble Apex Court in STATE OF PUNJAB
AND OTHERS VS. JAGJIT SINGH AND OTHERS, 2017 (1) SCC
148, has held that if one set of temporary employees are
discharging similar duties and responsibilities as are being
discharged by regular employees holding the same/corresponding
posts, they would be entitled to the same minimum pay scale. The
Hon'ble Court has delineated upon the law as settled regarding the
principle of "equal pay for equal work" and came to hold as under:
Man Singh vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 1 May, 2008
In these circumstances, we are of the considered
opinion that the applicants in the instant case are also legally
entitled to the similar treatment and pay in the similar
circumstances of the case under Articles 14 and 16 of the
Constitution of India, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex
Court in cases MAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND
OTHERS AIR 2008 SC 2481 and RAJENDRA YADAV VS. STATE
OF M.P. AND OTHERS 2013 (2) AISLJ, 120 wherein, it was ruled
that the concept of equality as enshrined in Article 14 of the
Constitution of India embraces the entire realm of State action. It
would extend to an individual as well not only when he is
discriminated against in the matter of exercise of right, but also in
the matter of imposing liability upon him. Equals are to be treated
equally even in the matter of executive or administrative action. As
a matter of fact, the Doctrine of equality is now turned as a
synonym of fairness in the concept of justice and stands as the
most accepted methodology of a governmental action. It was also
held that the administrative action should be just on the test of
'fair play' and reasonableness.
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Shakuntla Devi vs Uoi Etc on 29 March, 2017
9. The arguments in this case were heard along with O.A. No.
063/01526/2017 titled SHAKUNTLA DEVI & OTHERS VS. UNION OF
INDIA ETC. which has been allowed vide order dated 4.12.2018. The
facts of this case are similar to the facts of that case and as such this
O.A. also deserves to be allowed and disposed of in same terms. The
relevant paras of the order are reproduced as under:-
1