Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (2.28 seconds)

H.Anwar Basha vs The Registrar General (Incharge) on 1 July, 2008

3. Against the decision taken by the appellant/Board in depriving the respondent/writ petitioner of his appointment on compassionate ground stating that he being the son of the second wife of the deceased employee, he is not entitled for such appointment, the respondent/writ petitioner filed the writ petition. The learned single Judge, following the ratio laid down by the Division Bench in H.Anwar Basha v. Registrar General (Incharge), Madras High Court, Chennai and another reported in (2008) 5 MLJ 795 and also the decision rendered by another Division Bench in the case of N.Panneerselvam v. Secretary to Government and others reported in (2009) 1 MLJ 54, quashed the order impugned by directing the Board to pass appropriate orders on the application of the writ petitioner. Though the appellant/Board filed a review application against that order reiterating the grounds that the judgments relied upon by the learned single Judge are distinguishable on facts and not applicable to the case of the respondent/writ petitioner, the learned single Judge rejected the review application holding that no ground was made out to review the order passed in the writ petition.

N.Panneerselvam vs The Secretary To Government on 21 October, 2008

3. Against the decision taken by the appellant/Board in depriving the respondent/writ petitioner of his appointment on compassionate ground stating that he being the son of the second wife of the deceased employee, he is not entitled for such appointment, the respondent/writ petitioner filed the writ petition. The learned single Judge, following the ratio laid down by the Division Bench in H.Anwar Basha v. Registrar General (Incharge), Madras High Court, Chennai and another reported in (2008) 5 MLJ 795 and also the decision rendered by another Division Bench in the case of N.Panneerselvam v. Secretary to Government and others reported in (2009) 1 MLJ 54, quashed the order impugned by directing the Board to pass appropriate orders on the application of the writ petitioner. Though the appellant/Board filed a review application against that order reiterating the grounds that the judgments relied upon by the learned single Judge are distinguishable on facts and not applicable to the case of the respondent/writ petitioner, the learned single Judge rejected the review application holding that no ground was made out to review the order passed in the writ petition.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - P Jyothimani - Full Document
1