Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.32 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 387 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 386 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Govind Sakharam Ubhe vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 June, 2009
In the case of
Abdul Zakir Mirajkar (supra), the case of Kavitha Lankesh
(supra) and Govind Sakharam Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra
have been considered and by elaborately discussing the
provisions of MCOCA, the Apex Court has come to conclusion
that more than one charge-sheet is not required to be filed
with respect to each accused and charge-sheet filed in
respect of organized crime syndicate which is considered.
Herein, it is not in dispute that more than one charge-sheet
or offences are not registered against the petitioner
individually, but 58 offences registered against original
crime syndicate, which is mentioned in the impugned FIR.
Section 2 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 70 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Kavitha Lankesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2021
But, in the case of Kavitha Lankesh
(Supra), a Three Judges' Bench has observed that charge-
sheet not against individual but against the crime syndicate
is required to be considered and said requirement to invoke
offence under Section 3(1), not for other section of 3(2) to 3(5)
of the GUJCTOC Act.