Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (1.24 seconds)Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ramesh Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 October, 2001
In Ramesh Kumar v State of Chhattisgarh
(2001) 9 SCC 618, this Court while considering the
charge framed and the conviction for an offence under
Section 306 I.P.C. on the basis of dying declaration
recorded by an Executive Magistrate, in which she had
stated that previously there had been quarrel between
the deceased and her husband and on the day of
occurrence she had a quarrel with her husband who had
said that she could go wherever she wanted to go and
that thereafter she had poured kerosene on herself and
had set fire. Acquitting the accused this Court said:
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar vs State Of M.P on 1 May, 2002
Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sanju alias Sanjay Singh Sengar
CRM No. M 29852 of 2011 4
v. State of Madhya Pradesh 2002 (2) RCR(Criminal) 687, while relying on
the various judgments of the Apex Court held that the deceased committed
suicide on the third day of the quarrel after the accused told him to commit
suicide cannot be held that the suicide was direct result of quarrel. There
was enough time to the deceased to think over and reflect.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Kulwinder Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab And Anr. on 8 August, 2007
The Full Bench of this Court, in the case of Kulwinder Singh
and others vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052
has held that the compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of
harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the power
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is used to enhance such a compromise which,
in turn, enhances the social amity and reduces friction, then it truly is "finest
hour of justice". Disputes which have their genesis not only in matrimonial
discord but others as well, such compromise deserves to be accepted. It is
further held as under :-
Madan Mohan Abbot vs State Of Punjab on 26 March, 2008
In the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008
(4) S.C. Cases 582, the Apex Court emphasised and advised as under:-