Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)

Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007

10. From the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, more particularly, in paragraphs 26 and 27 in Sakiri Vasu [supra] and paragraph 3 in Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe [supra], this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has an adequate and efficacious remedy under law and the remedy is to approach the learned Magistrate under Section 156[3] of the CrPC by projecting that there have not been proper investigation in the case i.e. Biswanath Chariali Police Station Case no. 61/2020 [erstwhile, All Women Police Station Case no. 23/2020] and if the petitioner does so and if the Magistrate is prima facie satisfied that the investigation in the case is not being carried out in Page No.# 10/10 a proper manner he can ensure proper investigation and also monitor the investigation in the manner, as observed in Sakiri Vasu [supra] and Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe [supra].
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 8229 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 Next