Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.26 seconds)Birad Mal Singhvi vs Anand Purohit on 2 August, 1988
24. While dealing with a similar issue in Birad Mal
Singhvi v. Anand Purohit, this Court held as under:
Brij Mohan Singh vs Priya Brat Narain Sinha And Ors on 5 February, 1964
25. A Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing
with a similar issue in Brij Mohan Singh v. Priya Brat
Narain Sinha, observed as under: (AIR p. 286, para
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Satpal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 28 July, 2010
18. Further, regarding the admissibility of the documents proved in
support of the age of the prosecutix and their probative value, the
Supreme Court in the case of Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana,
(2010) 8 SCC 714 has held as under:-
State Of Bihar vs Radha Krishna Singh & Ors on 20 April, 1983
In State of Bihar v. Radha Krishna Singh6 this
Court dealt with a similar contention and held as
under:
Ram Chander Prasad Sharma vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 8 February, 1966
22. Therefore, a document may be admissible, but as
to whether the entry contained therein has any
probative value may still be required to be examined
in the facts and circumstances of a particular case.
The aforesaid legal proposition stands fortified by the
14 CRA No.9524/2018
judgments of this Court in Ram Prasad Sharma v.
State of Bihar; Ram Murti v. State of Haryana
Dayaram v. Dawalatshah; Harpal Singh v. State of
H.P.; Ravinder Singh Gorkhi v. State of U.P.; Babloo
Pasi v. State of Jharkhand; Desh Raj v. Bodh Raj and
Ram Suresh Singh v. Prabhat Singh. In these cases, it
has been held that even if the entry was made in an
official record by the official concerned in the
discharge of his official duty, it may have weight but
still may require corroboration by the person on
whose information the entry has been made and as to
whether the entry so made has been exhibited and
proved. The standard of proof required herein is the
same as in other civil and criminal cases. Such entries
may be in any public document i.e. school register,
voters list or family register prepared under the rules
and regulations, etc.
Harpal Singh And Anr. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 November, 1980
22. Therefore, a document may be admissible, but as
to whether the entry contained therein has any
probative value may still be required to be examined
in the facts and circumstances of a particular case.
The aforesaid legal proposition stands fortified by the
14 CRA No.9524/2018
judgments of this Court in Ram Prasad Sharma v.
State of Bihar; Ram Murti v. State of Haryana
Dayaram v. Dawalatshah; Harpal Singh v. State of
H.P.; Ravinder Singh Gorkhi v. State of U.P.; Babloo
Pasi v. State of Jharkhand; Desh Raj v. Bodh Raj and
Ram Suresh Singh v. Prabhat Singh. In these cases, it
has been held that even if the entry was made in an
official record by the official concerned in the
discharge of his official duty, it may have weight but
still may require corroboration by the person on
whose information the entry has been made and as to
whether the entry so made has been exhibited and
proved. The standard of proof required herein is the
same as in other civil and criminal cases. Such entries
may be in any public document i.e. school register,
voters list or family register prepared under the rules
and regulations, etc.
Ravinder Singh Gorkhi vs State Of U.P on 12 May, 2006
22. Therefore, a document may be admissible, but as
to whether the entry contained therein has any
probative value may still be required to be examined
in the facts and circumstances of a particular case.
The aforesaid legal proposition stands fortified by the
14 CRA No.9524/2018
judgments of this Court in Ram Prasad Sharma v.
State of Bihar; Ram Murti v. State of Haryana
Dayaram v. Dawalatshah; Harpal Singh v. State of
H.P.; Ravinder Singh Gorkhi v. State of U.P.; Babloo
Pasi v. State of Jharkhand; Desh Raj v. Bodh Raj and
Ram Suresh Singh v. Prabhat Singh. In these cases, it
has been held that even if the entry was made in an
official record by the official concerned in the
discharge of his official duty, it may have weight but
still may require corroboration by the person on
whose information the entry has been made and as to
whether the entry so made has been exhibited and
proved. The standard of proof required herein is the
same as in other civil and criminal cases. Such entries
may be in any public document i.e. school register,
voters list or family register prepared under the rules
and regulations, etc.