Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (1.77 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
The Right to Information Act, 2005
M/S Radha Krishan Industries vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 20 April, 2021
12. If the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order,
the petitioner has alternate remedy of appeal under the Waqf
Act, 1995. When the petitioner has alternate remedy, he
cannot approach this Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India. The judgment of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Radha Krishnan Industries v. State of Himachal
Pradesh and others [(2021) 6 SCC 771] relating to alternate
remedy will not apply to the facts of this case. There is prima
facie evidence in this case to show that the Sangham was
treated as dealing with Waqf property at least since 2016.
Having convinced of a prima facie case, the Waqf Board has
entertained the OP filed by respondents 2 and 3. I find no
illegality in the proceedings before the Waqf Board.
Haji.P.Liakath Alikhan vs K.Unneenkutty Saquafi on 7 September, 2005
In Haji P.
Liakath Alikhan v. K. Unneenkutty Saquafi and others
[2005 KHC 1228], this Court has held that when there is no
express dedication of property, there will be no Waqf and a
Waqf Tribunal has no jurisdiction to try a Suit, urged the
petitioner.
1