Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)The Companies Act, 2013
Section 164 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
The Registrar Of Companies Maharashtra ... vs Shailendrajit Charanjit Rai on 7 September, 2018
1. Even though, learned counsel for the respondents invites our attention
to the orders passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.18603-
18703/2018 in the case of Registrar of Companies Maharashtra Mumbai
&Anr. Vs. ShailendrajitCharanjit Rai &Anr. and submit that no interim
relief be granted, we are of the considered view that the order passed by the
Supreme Court is with regard to a final judgment rendered by the Bombay
High Court and for the present in view of the consistent orders passed by us
in more than 100 cases, we see no reason to deviate from the same.
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 164 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Commr.Of Income Tax-I,New Delhi vs Vatika Township P.Ltd on 15 September, 2014
In this regard, reliance
has been placed on behalf of the petitioner on the pronouncements of the
Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court reported at (2015) 1 SCC 1
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi v. Vatika Township
Pvt. Ltd. and another pronouncement reported at (2018) SCC OnLine SC 59
Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai v. M/s Essar Teleholdings Ltd.
through its Manager which relies on Vatika(supra).
1