Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Emperor vs Braz H. De Souza on 12 April, 1911
Following the observations of Scott, C.J. in Emperor v. B.H. De Souza I.L.R. (1911) 35 Bom. 412, we hold agreeing with Subba Rao, J., that the mere demolition and reconstruction of the wall on new foundation would not amount to reconstruction of a building. The reference in Clause (a) of Section 3(24) to "one-half of its cubical contents" also supports our conclusion.
Section 3 in Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 [Entire Act]
The Bandra City Municipality vs Dr. D.A. D'Month on 19 January, 1923
We respect-fully agree with the above observations of Scott, C.J. Another Decision of the same court in Bandra City Municipality v. D.A.D.Monte A.I.R. 1923 Bom. 407, was brought to our notice, but it contains no discussion whatever of the points. Nor is there any reference in the judgment to the earlier decision referred to above.
1