Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.20 seconds)
Sh. Y.N. Bhargava vs Assocham on 4 September, 2010 cites

Bhogadi Kannababu & Ors vs Vuggina Pydamma & Ors on 12 May, 2006

10 Relationship There is absolutely no dispute between the parties that relationship between the parties that relationship of landlord and tenant was in existence between them qua the suit property. Although we need not dwell up the question of ownership of property yet it was held in Bhogadi Kanna Babu Vs Vuggina Pydamma Vugging , 2006 (5) SCC 532 that a tenant let into possession cannot deny his landlord's title howsoever defective so long as he was not openly restored the possession of surrendered the premises to him.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 69 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. vs B.N. Chadha (Deceased) Through Lrs. And ... on 10 October, 2006

10.07.95 and supplementary agreement dated 06.07.06. Both are insufficiently stamped and unregistered documents. It cannot be disputed that lease of immovable property from year to year or a yearly rent can be made only by a registered instrument (Sec. 107 of Transfer of Property Act). The documents thus cannot be relied upon much less enforced, even for collateral purpose. The term of lease mentioned in the documents therefore, is redundant . It has been held in M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. Vs B N Chaddha, 133 (2006) DLT 573; GM Enterprises Vs S E M Tian Export and Hotel Pvt. Ltd , 118 (2005) DLT 500 and Singer India Ltd. Vs Amita Gupta, Air 1999 Delhi 377 and Uptron Powertronics Vs G L Rawal, AIR 1999 Delhi.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 9 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Singer India Ltd. vs Amita Gupta on 29 September, 2000

10.07.95 and supplementary agreement dated 06.07.06. Both are insufficiently stamped and unregistered documents. It cannot be disputed that lease of immovable property from year to year or a yearly rent can be made only by a registered instrument (Sec. 107 of Transfer of Property Act). The documents thus cannot be relied upon much less enforced, even for collateral purpose. The term of lease mentioned in the documents therefore, is redundant . It has been held in M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. Vs B N Chaddha, 133 (2006) DLT 573; GM Enterprises Vs S E M Tian Export and Hotel Pvt. Ltd , 118 (2005) DLT 500 and Singer India Ltd. Vs Amita Gupta, Air 1999 Delhi 377 and Uptron Powertronics Vs G L Rawal, AIR 1999 Delhi.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 23 - A Kumar - Full Document

Uttam Singh Dugal & Co.Ltd vs Unied Bank Of India & Ors on 8 August, 2000

8 Arguments on behalf of the parties have been heard. I have also minutely perused the file. The background of the ratio in Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. Vs United Bank of India (2007) 7 Sec 120, it has been held by a Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Prem Narain Mishra Vs Fairly Brothers Export & Import RFA (OS) No. 1/05 decided on 12.07.07 (Manu/DE/8255 / 2007) that the objective and purpose of enacting the provision like Or. 12 Rule 6 CPC is to enable the court to pronounce judgment on admission when these are sufficient to entitle the Plaintiff a decree. Such a provision is enacted to render speedy judgments and save the parties from going through rigmarole of protracted trial. The admissions can be in the pleadings or otherwise in documents correspondence etc. These can be oral or in writing . The admissions can even be constructive admissions and need not be specific or expressive which can be inferred from the vague and evasive denial in the Written statement while answering specific pleas raised by the Cont...
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 394 - Full Document
1   2 Next