Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.01 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Gurbinder Kaur Brar And Anr vs Uoi And Ors on 22 July, 2013
33. To our mind, though in Surinder Singh Brars' case, the issue
was mainly that procedure had not been followed so as to benefit some
private interest of building/construction companies, however, the law laid
down in that case, as also reiterated in Gurbinder Kaur Brars' case, as seen
VIKAS CHANDER
2014.09.05 10:10
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
CWP No.9638 of 2005 -14-
above, is that it is the Administrator of the Union Territory of Chandigarh,
alone, who is the Competent Authority to sanction acquisition proceedings
in respect of any land sought to be compulsorily acquired under the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894, and that such authority cannot be delegated to the
Advisor to the Administrator.
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gulabrao Keshavrao Patil & Ors vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 1 December, 1995
24. Addressing arguments, shri Arun Jain, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for the petitioner, basically reiterated all that we have reproduced
above from the pleadings, and further relied upon the under given three
judgments of the Supreme Court, to submit that the acquisition process
itself was bad, not having been sanctioned by a competent authority. The
judgements relied upon by him are Gulabrao Keshavrao Patil and others v.
State of Gujarat and others(1996) 2 SCC 26, Surinder Singh Brar and others
v. Union of India and others (2013) 1 SCC 403 and Gurbinder Kaur Brar
and another v. Union of India and others (2013) 11 SCC 228.
1