Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.35 seconds)Sushma Mutreja vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 August, 2001
e. Applicants have also cited the Hon‟ble Supreme court
observation in Sushma Mutreja v U.O.I reported in CA 4995-
4996 wherein it was held as under:
Ashok Kumar Shrivastava And Ors vs Ram Lal And Others on 8 January, 2008
b) Ashok Kumar Shrivastava v. Ram Lal, (2008) 3 SCC 148 :
Vijaya Kumar Shrotriya vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 13 February, 1998
(See Vijaya Kumar Shrotriya v. State of U.P., (1998) 3 SCC 397)
Amarjeet Singh & Ors vs Devi Ratan & Ors on 18 November, 2009
d) Amarjeet Singh v. Devi Ratan,(2010) 1 SCC 417,
Dr. S.P. Kapoor Etc vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Etc on 2 November, 1981
27..... An officer cannot be granted seniority prior to his birth in the
cadre adversely affecting the seniority of other officers who had
been appointed prior to him. "The latecomers to the regular stream
cannot steal a march over the early arrivals in the regular queue."
[Vide S.P. Kapoor (Dr.) v. State of H.P. (1981) 4 SCC 716 Shitla
Prasad Shukla v. State of U.P. (1986) Supp 185 SCC p. 190, para
Shitla Prasad Shukla vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 19 May, 1986
27..... An officer cannot be granted seniority prior to his birth in the
cadre adversely affecting the seniority of other officers who had
been appointed prior to him. "The latecomers to the regular stream
cannot steal a march over the early arrivals in the regular queue."
[Vide S.P. Kapoor (Dr.) v. State of H.P. (1981) 4 SCC 716 Shitla
Prasad Shukla v. State of U.P. (1986) Supp 185 SCC p. 190, para
Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors on 25 September, 2006
10) and Uttaranchal Forest Rangers‟ Assn. (Direct Recruit) v. State
of U.P. (2006) 10 SCC 346]
....... The appellants who had been promoted with an earlier
date,thus, are bound to be senior than the respondents who had
11 O
been promoted with respect from a later date. No employee can
claim seniority prior to the date of his birth in the cadre.
Union Of India And Another vs Onkar Chand And Others on 2 February, 1998
g) To further strengthen their case applicants quoted the Hon‟ble
Supreme Court judgment in U.O.I and anr v Onkar Chand and ors
reported in 1998 (9) SCC 298 as under:
Union Of India vs Smt. Sadhana Khanna on 14 December, 2007
(1) The Apex Court in a recent case decided on 14.12.2007 (Union of India
vs. Sadhana Khanna, C.A. No. 8208/01) held that the mistake of the
department cannot recoiled on employees.