Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.47 seconds)The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kamala S vs Vidyadharan M.J. & Anr on 20 February, 2007
(c) "Kamla S. vs Vidyadharan M.J. & Anr." (2007) 5
SCC 264.
Section 142 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 4 July, 2006
(a) "M.S. Narayana Menon vs State of Kerala" (2006) 6
SCC 39.
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
8. It is settled law once the signatures on the cheque in
question are admitted by the accused, the burden comes to the
accused to rebut the presumption that cheque was not issued
towards any liability. It is important to note here the
observations made by the Supreme Court in the judgment
"Rangappa vs S.Mohan AIR 2010 SC 1898" decided on 07.05.2010
wherein the Apex court has described the standard of proof on
the accused to rebut the presumptions raised against him under
the N.I.Act. The relevant para of the judgment is reproduced
as under: -