Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.03 seconds)
R. Rajangam vs The Commissioner Of Prohibition And ... on 6 December, 2007 cites

Uttaranchal Road Transport Corpn.And ... vs Mansaram Nainwal on 28 July, 2006

32. With great respect to the learned Judge, the views expressed by him in the Miscellaneous Petition do not have any binding precedent, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Uttaranchal Road Transport Corporation v. Mansaram Nainwal's case and therefore, I am of the considered view that the petitioner has failed to discharge the burden of proving that there is a consent for renewal of FL3 licence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 106 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Anr vs Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. And Anr on 20 November, 2003

16. The Supreme Court in catena of decisions, in State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala reported in 1995 (1) SCR 305, Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka , State of A.P. v. McDowell and Co. reported in 1996 (3) SCC 709, State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. , Ashok Lanka v. Rishi Dixit and other similar decisions held that the State while exercising its power of parting with the privilege to deal with liquor, as a positive obligation, should strictly confirm to the public interest and ensure public health, welfare and safety.
Supreme Court of India Cites 194 - Cited by 555 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

P. John Chandy And Company (P) Ltd vs John P. Thomas on 29 April, 2002

In P. John Chandy's case, the suit property was rented out to the appellant company on the basis of an oral lease, by original landlord (grandfather of respondent) in 1949. The appellant created sub-leases and allowed the tenants from time to time. The landlord served a notice in 1981 to terminate the sub lease, but the tenant had failed to comply with the notice. The respondent/landlord filed eviction petition on the ground that the appellant-company had transferred his rights by creating sub leases in favour of other persons without his consent. The Rent Controller, accepted the contentions of the landlord that there was no consent to create sub tenancy. But the appellate authority has reversed the decision of the Rent Controller and recorded the finding to the effect that, in the absence of any evidence either oral and documentary, the terms of tenancy have to be gathered from the long course of conduct of the parties even since commencement of the tenancy in 1949.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 62 - B Kumar - Full Document

The State Of Bombay vs R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala on 9 April, 1957

16. The Supreme Court in catena of decisions, in State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala reported in 1995 (1) SCR 305, Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka , State of A.P. v. McDowell and Co. reported in 1996 (3) SCC 709, State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. , Ashok Lanka v. Rishi Dixit and other similar decisions held that the State while exercising its power of parting with the privilege to deal with liquor, as a positive obligation, should strictly confirm to the public interest and ensure public health, welfare and safety.
Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 463 - Full Document
1   2 Next