Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)
M Lavanya Devi vs The State Of Telangana on 19 February, 2020 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

Insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are concerned, on perusal of the charge sheet and the material in support of the same, there are specific allegations against them that after the birth of the child, they went to London and where they harassed the 3rd respondent/complainant. Therefore, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such 4 ground appears to be available to them on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.4664 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are refused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document

State Of Bihar Etc. Etc vs P.P. Sharma, Ias And Anr on 2 April, 1991

Insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are concerned, on perusal of the charge sheet and the material in support of the same, there are specific allegations against them that after the birth of the child, they went to London and where they harassed the 3rd respondent/complainant. Therefore, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such 4 ground appears to be available to them on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.4664 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are refused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 15092 - K Singh - Full Document

M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004

Insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are concerned, on perusal of the charge sheet and the material in support of the same, there are specific allegations against them that after the birth of the child, they went to London and where they harassed the 3rd respondent/complainant. Therefore, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such 4 ground appears to be available to them on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.4664 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are refused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 16299 - A Pasayat - Full Document

R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960

Insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are concerned, on perusal of the charge sheet and the material in support of the same, there are specific allegations against them that after the birth of the child, they went to London and where they harassed the 3rd respondent/complainant. Therefore, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such 4 ground appears to be available to them on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P.Kapur v. State of Punjab1; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2; State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma3 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited v. Mohd. Saraful Haque and another4. Hence, the prayer for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.4664 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, insofar as the petitioner Nos.1 and 2/A-2 and A-3 are refused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 15811 - J C Shah - Full Document
1